America: Life, Liberty, Happiness

Our U.S. Constitution stems from our Declaration of Independence which references “Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The U.S. Constitution was constructed in such a fashion as to have the least amount of law in order to protect ones naturally born individual unalienable rights, maintaining civility within our nation with the least amount of government intrusion.

Individual natural unalienable rights, means no one can take any of those rights away unless the individual(s) agrees to it. We lend not give away some rights to a structured small government to maintain a stable environment for all.

We are not a pure Democracy but a representative Republic, meaning the people have representatives from their cities, towns, state and at federal level to represent the peoples will. To have pure Democracy only leads to mob rule leaving out people who may have their natural rights encroached upon, so we elect representatives to govern. This ensures the greatest opportunity of preserving naturally born rights for everyone.

Our nation is unique from the rest of the world because our framers of the U.S. Constitution, which fought a war with England, threw off an all-powerful centralized government. We left England’s grasp at a heavy cost in lives in order to regain our freedom from centralized tyranny, returning control of our natural rights that was mostly taken away.

Your natural rights of life, liberty and happiness are the baseline by which we all naturally operate from. Understanding these rights we elect representatives to oversee and protect those rights.

Today we are facing the result of 100 years of Progressive centralized over controlling elitists at the federal level that have instituted controls that have degraded too much of our natural rights.

Today there are some who call themselves Nationalists. A Nationalist fixates only at our federal level in our nation as the most powerful and that is not how our U.S. Constitution was constructed or agreed to by the original 13 colonies, Colonies which became our first states of the United States. The federal level is supposed to be limited in power; not so today.

The individual in America must be awake and always engaged in government business at all levels so it does not draw too much power to itself, as it has done so today.

There is a growing danger today by many that do not understand our structure of government which is meant to prevent all power going to a central government. To lean on such centralized power (Nationalist) invites tyranny; remember Nazi Germany?

So how did we get here? Because the people did not understand nor did they have the time to stay focused on people that would abuse their power; busy with common living.

Our Constitution was written in such a skeletal fashion of laws that it demands the American people stay focused on government at all times. The Constitution was built for limited government. Stay focused on your government or it will stay overly focused on you!

Recommend: When Politics tread on Natural law

The Democrats/progressives believe that individual Will is mute and must be absorbed with the collective/body and managed by the state.

Load More...

KGB Memo on Senator Ted Kennedy – Collusion?

With all the calls of supposed collusion by Democratic Party leaders including the various media on President Trump’s 2016 campaign and as of late, Donald J. Trump Jr. innocent meeting with a Russian, was this a Russian set-up?

It appears now all this fake collusion business is to stop President Trump’s agenda. The American people have caught on and in particular many are upset with the Republican’s in Congress for sitting on their hands about the “collusion business”.

Following is a memo about then, Senator Ted Kennedy and his wishes to diffuse the arms race and run for President in 1984 against Reagan. Is this real collusion or not? There is no doubt in my mind had Kennedy been the Democratic nominee and beat out Reagan in 1984, there would still be today a Soviet Union along with Warsaw Pact countries; old Warsaw Pact countries that are free today. The Berlin Wall would have never come down with East Berliners still living under Communist tyranny.


Special Importance
Committee on State Security of the USSR
14.05. 1983 No. 1029 Ch/OV
Moscow

Regarding Senator Kennedy’s request to the General Secretary of the Communist Party Comrade Y.V. Andropov

Comrade Y.V. Andropov

On 9-10 May of this year, Senator Edward Kennedy’s close friend and trusted confidant J. Tunney was in Moscow. The senator charged Tunney to convey the following message, through confidential contacts, to the General Secretary of the Center Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Y. Andropov.

Senator Kennedy, like other rational people, is very troubled by the current state of Soviet-American relations. Events are developing such that this relationship coupled with the general state of global affairs will make the situation even more dangerous. The main reason for this is Reagan’s belligerence, and his firm commitment to deploy new American middle range nuclear weapons within Western Europe.

According to Kennedy, the current threat is due to the President’s refusal to engage any modification on his politics. He feels that his domestic standing has been strengthened because of the well publicized improvement of the economy: inflation has been greatly reduced, production levels are increasing as is overall business activity. For these reasons, interest rates will continue to decline. The White House has portrayed this in the media as the “success of Reaganomics.”

Naturally, not everything in the province of economics has gone according to Reagan’s plan. A few well known economists and members of financial circles, particularly from the north-eastern states, foresee certain hidden tendencies that many bring about a new economic crisis in the USA. This could bring about the fall of the presidential campaign of 1984, which would benefit the Democratic party. Nevertheless, there are no secure assurances this will indeed develop.

The only real threats to Reagan are problems of war and peace and Soviet-American relations. These issues, according to the senator, will without a doubt become the most important of the election campaign. The movement advocating a freeze on nuclear arsenals of both countries continues to gain strength in the United States. The movement is also willing to accept preparations, particularly from Kennedy, for its continued growth. In political and influential circles of the country, including within Congress, the resistence to growing military expenditures is gaining strength.

However, according to Kennedy, the opposition to Reagan is still very weak. Reagan’s adversaries are divided and the presentations they make are not fully effective. Meanwhile, Reagan has the capabilities to effectively counter any propaganda. In order to neutralize criticism that the talks between the USA and the USSR are non-constructive, Reagan will grandiose, but subjectively propagandistic. At the same time, Soviet officials who speak about disarmament will be quoted out of context, silenced or groundlessly and whimsically discounted. Although arguments and statements by officials of the USSR do appear in the press, it is important to note the majority of Americans do not read serious newspapers or periodicals.

Kennedy believes that, given the current state of affairs, and in the interest of peace, it would be prudent and timely to undertake the following steps to counter the militaristic politics of Reagan and his campaign to psychologically burden the American people. In this regard, he offers the following proposals to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Y.V. Andropov:

  1. Kennedy asks Y.V. Andropov to consider inviting the senator to Moscow for a personal meeting in July of this year. The main purpose of the meeting, according to the senator, would be to arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA. He would also like to inform you that he has planned a trip through Western Europe, where he anticipates meeting England’s Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and French President Mitterand in which he will exchange similar ideas regarding the same issues.

If his proposals would be accepted in principle, Kennedy would send his representative to Moscow to resolve questions regarding organizing such a visit.

Kennedy thinks the benefits of a meeting with Y.V.Andropov will be enhanced if he could also invite one of the well known Republican senators, for example, Mark Hatfield. Such a meeting will have a strong impact on American and political circles in the USA (In March of 1982, Hatfield and Kennedy proposed a project to freeze the nuclear arsenals of the USA and USSR and pblished a book on the theme as well.)

  1. Kennedy believes that in order to influence Americans it would be important to organize in August-September of this year, televised interviews with Y.V. Andropov in the USA. A direct appeal by the General Secretary to the American people will, without a doubt, attact a great deal of attention and interest in the country. The senator is convinced this would receive the maximum resonance in so far as television is the most effective method of mass media and information.

If the proposal is recognized as worthy, then Kennedy and his friends will bring about suitable steps to have representatives of the largest television companies in the USA contact Y.V. Andropov for an invitation to Moscow for the interview. Specifically, the president of the board of directors of ABC, Elton Raul and television columnists Walter Cronkite or Barbara Walters could visit Moscow. The senator underlined the importance that this initiative should be seen as coming from the American side.

Furthermore, with the same purpose in mind, a series of televised interviews in the USA with lower level Soviet officials, particularly from the military would be organized. They would also have an opportunity to appeal directly to the American people about the peaceful intentions of the USSR, with their own arguments about maintaining a true balance of power between the USSR and the USA in military term. This issue is quickly being distorted by Reagan’s administration.

Kennedy asked to convey that this appeal to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union is his effort to contribute a strong proposal that would root out the threat of nuclear war, and to improve Soviet-American relations, so that they define the safety of the world. Kennedy is very impressed with the activities of Y.V. Andropov and other Soviet leaders, who expressed their commitment to heal international affairs, and improve mutal understandings between peoples.

The senator underscored that he eagerly awaits a reply to his appeal, the answer to which may be delivered through Tunney.

Having conveyed Kennedy’s appeal to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Tunney also explained that Senator Kennedy has in the last few years actively made appearances to reduce the threat of war. Because he formally refused to partake in the election campaign of 1984, his speeches would be taken without prejudice as they are not tied to any campaign promises. Tunney remarked that the senator wants to run for president in 1988. At that time, he will be 56 and his personal problems, which could hinder his standing, will be resolved (Kennedy has just completed a divorce and plans to remarry in the near future). Taken together, Kennedy does not discount that during the 1984 campaign, the Democratic Party may officially turn to him to lead the fight against the Republicans and elect their candidate president. This would explain why he is convinced that none of the candidates today have a real chance at defeating Reagan.

We await instructions.

President of the committee
V. Chebrikov

 

 

 

 

 


The Democrats/progressives believe that individual Will is mute and must be absorbed with the collective/body and managed by the state.

Load More...

When Politics Tread on “Natural Law”

John Locke (1632–1704) as well as Plato and Aristotle were among the most influential philosophers of their day. In Locke’s Two Treatises of Government, he defended the claim that men are by nature free and equal against claims that God had made all people naturally subject to a monarch. He argued that people have rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and property that have a foundation independent of the laws of any particular society.

For the Golden Rule — Confucius around 500 BC had the following for one to live by: “Do not impose on others what you do not wish for yourself.” In the Christian Bible Matthew wrote what Jesus said for one to live by “So whatever you wish that others would do to you do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets.

In our Declaration of Independence the writers of the document had agreed that natural law was prominent in man from birth, that life liberty and happiness springs from our birth naturally in every human being. That no one has the right to subjugate one from it without permission.

Let’s look at the second paragraph to the Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,”

Politicians today take from one and give to the other, in some cases this is fine for a short period of time in order to help the needy pull themselves up and care for themselves, but we all know it has become permanent for some, even generational for families. Benjamin Franklin once said make them uncomfortable in poverty so they will not stay in it, government should make them uncomfortable in poverty.  However, politicians today enable people to stay in poverty and do this for votes and reelection. The two major party system today, Republican and Democrat, virtually assures them the seats of power, because most people don’t have the backing or money to win enough to become elected and to straighten out the onslaught on an individual’s natural rights, so those (politicians) of the Republican and Democrat party keep winning decades long.

If you can understand the base of natural law concerning life, liberty and happiness one can easily tell if politicians are taking you for a ride when they propose a piece of legislation. Today it’s a healthcare bill, but its true nature will violate, “life, liberty and happiness”; all three. Just think what it will do to you: encroach on your personal “liberty” of choice, make healthcare expensive causing it to diminish your “happiness” and may even cost you your “life” due to choices available and costs of premiums.

Remember the “natural laws” you were born with and use it as your measure for anything that would get in the way of “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”. And you will easily be able to tell if you are being taken for the ride of your “life” by politicians that are supposed to have all our natural rights at heart and not just a few they have enslaved to reelect them time after time.

What did Ronald Reagan say about Socialized medicine? One thing is for sure it diminishes, “Life, Liberty and Happiness”; all three of the “Natural Laws”

 

Further reading on basic needs: Socialism Does It Fit Mankind

The Democrats/progressives believe that individual Will is mute and must be absorbed with the collective/body and managed by the state.

Load More...

 

Democrat’s Dangerous Rhetoric Comes Home

There was a terrible shooting in Alexandria Virginia on June 14, 2016 just like many other shootings that occurs when innocent people are injured or killed. However, this time it really came home when congressional Republicans where at an early morning ball practice for an upcoming charity game against their Democrat counterparts from Capitol Hill.

The gunman was a past Bernie Sander’s campaign supporter when he was running for President during the 2016 election cycle.

The gunmen asked 2 individuals that where there at the ballpark if those were Republicans or Democrats that were out on the ball field and they said they are Republicans. They thought it was strange this individual would ask them that but shrugged it off and went back to the Capitol. But once back there they heard the news of what had happened and immediately told police about the incident. Later as it turned out they identified the same man that did the shooting that asked them about the political affiliations of the ball players.

The gunman was sixty six year old James T. Hodgkinson that opened fire on the Republican Congressmen. Majority Whip Steve Scalise was injured along with 4 others. The gunman was engaged by Capitol police and was shot and later died at the hospital. Congressman Scalise was shot in the hip.

Had Majority Whip Scalise not been there with an authorized contingent of Capitol Police, that he was authorized, the death toll would most certainly have been higher, because no one else was armed.

There is another side to this story and one can point a finger directly at the Democrats for the kind of rhetoric they have said over the years, especially the last 8 years. Though Democrats and Republicans alike condemned the obvious planned attack in Capitol chambers, the Democrats do share in the blame for what happened on that ball field. Just because they only ramped up the hate towards Conservatives does not mean that they don’t bear any attachment to a terrible event. Their crime is a moral one, not the type prosecuted in a court of law, but in the court of morality!

Coarse rhetoric has been spilled many times by Democrat political figures including the past President of the United States, Barack Obama, rhetoric which has bordered on violence without actually indicating such. But it has been very easy to surmise that it was exactly the kind of pot that they were surely stirring and violence did occur many times over and they own a piece of it! 

The Democrats/progressives believe that individual Will is mute and must be absorbed with the collective/body and managed by the state.

Load More...

Stopping Terrorists Immigrating as Refugees

President Trump has tried to stop certain countries that harbor terrorists from allowing people to immigrate as refugees into the United States on a couple of occasions through Executive Order. He had instituted those travel restrictions to the United States until such time as the refugees could be properly vetted. Several court cases have over turned each Executive order, indicating it was not proper for him to write such an order.

President Trump could write something on the order of another Executive Order to the State Department and other departments involved in the issuing of Visas, to temporarily halt the Visa program until such time foreign travelers can be properly vetted. This would not apply to those countries that are presently on the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) list.

  • 41.122 Revocation of visas.

(a)Grounds for revocation by consular officers. A consular officer, the Secretary, or a Department official to whom the Secretary has delegated this authority is authorized to revoke a nonimmigrant visa at any time, in his or her discretion.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/22/41.122

Currently these are the only countries allowed to travel to the United States without a Visa:

Andorra Hungary Norway
Australia Iceland Portugal
Austria Ireland San Marino
Belgium Italy Singapore
Brunei Japan Slovakia
Chile Latvia Slovenia
Czech Republic Liechtenstein South Korea
Denmark Lithuania Spain
Estonia Luxembourg Sweden
Finland Malta Switzerland
France Monaco Taiwan*
Germany Netherlands United Kingdom**
Greece New Zealand

These countries are not allowed to travel under a Visa Waiver: ·  Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, or Yemen on or after March 1, 2011 (with limited exceptions for travel for diplomatic or military purposes in the service of a VWP country).

  • Nationals of VWP countries who are also nationals of Iran, Iraq, Sudan, or Syria.

https://travel.state.gov/content/visas/en/visit/visa-waiver-program.html

Failing a temporary Visa restriction being overturned in court, it may well be in the national security interest of the United States to cancel the Visa Waiver Program and all Visas until such time proper vetting can be instituted. The fact the courts alone ruled against President Trump’s Executive Order is not only ridiculous but well outside the bounds of the courts authority to legislate from the bench.

The Democrats/progressives believe that individual Will is mute and must be absorbed with the collective/body and managed by the state.

Load More...

London Bridge Mock Terrorist?

From watching the video of the recent London Bridge Terrorist strike that took place on Saturday June 3, it appears that authorities may have set-up a mock terrorist suspect that was caught with a suicide vest strapped around his body.

Is it possible that the Police are so boxed in on conducting adequate surveillance to track and react to possible terrorist situations that they added to the drama of this terrible attack on Londoners?

The crisis in the United Kingdom on Islamic terrorism has seemed to hit at fever pitch levels of frustration for authorities and that all that can be done is to react after the fact.

 

 

 

 

 

This scene above with apparent terrorist and what appears to be bombs strapped to him, is on the ground and as seen on national television.

Below is the video that shows emergency personnel changing clothes and one of them appears to match the supposed terrorist as seen above. Watch.

UPDATE June 7, 2016

Watching this next video may explain why the Police in London are so frustrated and staged what appears to be a Mock terrorist capture, shown on national television around the world. Mayor Sadiq Khan’s comments after letting 400 Jihadist back in to the city: “we don’t have the resources to track Jihadist”  Maybe the London police set this up in order to obtain more resources they need to protect the people of London. Can anyone blame them?

The Democrats/progressives believe that individual Will is mute and must be absorbed with the collective/body and managed by the state.

Load More...

Muslims Combating Violent Jihad?

A host indicated when combating terrorism at the new anti-terrorism facility [Quote] “because we know these groups can only be defeated if we defeat their ideology,” [end Quote] according to Mohammed al-Issa, secretary-general of the Saudi-based Muslim World League. The host also said 350 technicians will work the main room, which is filled with rows of computers and with dozens of individual workstations.

Saudi Arabia, which is a Muslim nation that practices Islam, built within a 30 day period an anti-terrorism center so that terrorism can be stopped before it is carried out. The looming question is why would they do this considering they are Islamist as well? Before I give an explanation there are a few versus one should read.

Some versus about Islam –

Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 484: – “Allah said, ‘A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.’”

Quran (9:14)“Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people.” Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even “heals” the hearts of Muslims.

Tabari 17:187 “‘By God, our religion (din) from which we have departed is better and more correct than that which these people follow. Their religion does not stop them from shedding blood, terrifying the roads, and seizing properties.’ And they returned to their former religion.” The words of a group of Christians who had converted to Islam, but realized their error after being shocked by the violence and looting committed in the name of Allah. The price of their decision to return to a religion of peace was that the men were beheaded and the woman and children enslaved by the caliph Ali.

Europe has been flooded with Muslim refugees for some time; some countries have shut down borders to keep them out. The natives of the European nations have experienced many terrorist strikes by bombings and any other types of items they could use as a weapon over the years. The governments in the European nations can only react when it’s over for the most part, cleaning up the mess. Women and female children have been raped on the streets and even turned into sex slaves.

A probable answer as to why an Anti-Terrorism center built by Muslims to stop Muslims-

  1. Muslim countries simply do not have the types of weapons to just take over the nations they want; the weapons the Infidels have (non-Muslim) are far superior and can take out all Muslim nations in an instant if they wanted to.
  1. It is in the best interest of other Muslim nations to find and stop a terrorist strike in those infidel dominated nations that are now flooded with Muslim refugees. Why would they do this, because the new Islamic attack plan is to integrate into these nations peacefully, to the point where the Muslims themselves take over through public office, by teaching their ideology and by out birthing the infidels; this is also happening in the U.S. Most Europeans do not have large families but most Muslim families can be quite large in number. A peaceful takeover of non-Muslim nations takes time to accomplish but the end is the same and this method is called Civilization Jihad. However, the Islamist hot heads that flooded into Europe can’t seem to help themselves and wait to dominate peacefully so the fight as their religion dictates they do and is carried out through violent Jihad!

So now it appears why the Saudi’s built an Anti-Terrorism center in the first place. To stop the violent terrorist strikes around the world so that the peaceful war known as “Civilization Jihad” can someday win and non-Islamic nations become Islamic nations.

Civilization Jihad

Update: New information on the Saudi government

 

 

 

 

 

Riyadh attempts to illegally login to my website:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Democrats/progressives believe that individual Will is mute and must be absorbed with the collective/body and managed by the state.

Load More...

Civilization Jihad Slow Kill

Civilization Jihad is the slow progression of injecting Islamic ideology into a civilized society, rather than through opened armed conflict of the past to take over a nation, but it is a war. In effect it is more dangerous than Terrorism alone because it slowly eats away at the fabric of an unsuspecting society through peaceful means and slowly introduces Islamic ideology into educational institutions while gaining power through elected public office in government.

Currently with the massive flood of Muslims into Europe the governments of those nations thought they were actually trying to help refugees in war torn areas of the Middle East. When the flood of migrants came in there were massive problems, such as rape, murder and enslavement of females in those nations. And on top of that Terrorist strikes in the form of bombings and anything else at the disposal of those who wanted to kill infidels immediately (non-believers). Government officials even went so far as to excuse rapes because the refugees were from other nations and did not know any better. Government officials have even told the native population that they must assimilate.

Europe is basically overrun now and government officials will do nothing to eject the refugees from their lands, they even have their own court system based on Sharia law. The Islamist has a strong foothold and the only option for Europe, at present, is to deport on a mass scale while they have the power, sending the refugees back to the Middle East.

Several countries in Europe have closed their borders in order to protect their own people but other European nations are completely overrun. If Europe does nothing to eject the threat, Europe may eventually collapse into civil war in order to eject the enemy from within, but time is running out.

Today the United States is facing its very own Civilization Jihad in various parts of the nation. Americans who have no idea about Islam are embracing these newcomers as many act so peaceful and loving towards our people. Various public schools have embraced Islam into their curriculum for American children. There are at present two Muslims that are United States Congressmen and others seeking office locally throughout the nation. All of this (Civilization Jihad) is part of the plan hatched by the Muslim Brotherhood. Even our past President, Barack Hussein Obama, having lived under the ideology of Islam, had advisors from the Muslim Brotherhood and he allowed thousands of refugees into our nation.

All of these mass migrations by Muslims are for one sole purpose and that is to take over the world and establish Islam as the only religion in the world and they may succeed if nothing is done to stop them.

Update: it appears the various governments want a Civil War erupting, engaging the populace to stop it and then what freedoms you did have are now gone. This is an old trick where the government causes the problem, then responds to fix it and then everyone’s life as they knew it is permanently changed. The flood of refugees is nothing more than the catalyst.

Flood them In:

Some Rape Them:

But Go To Work:

THE PLAN OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD:

ISLAM THREAT TO EUROPE:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Links of Interest:

Civilization Jihad   Jihad Watch

Versus of Violence in the Quran

Database of Masjids, Mosques and Islamic Centers in the U.S.

The Democrats/progressives believe that individual Will is mute and must be absorbed with the collective/body and managed by the state.

Load More...

Bashing the Left Burns in the Hate

As many Americans know after the 2016 election the youth who are on the Left, be they a Marxist or whatever their flavor is has protested violently over the past election; they continue protesting on a daily basis. Whether it’s “Safe Spaces” where only their speech is allowed or burning the U.S. flag, these kids are basically innocent, yes, I said innocent.

We trash them continually on social media and in person and all that really does is fuel our own anger and it also enables and fuels the anger of the younger Left, meaning those of college age and above for the most part.

Using Twitter daily I even found myself joining in the fray trashing the “snowflakes” and for that I wish I had never done it. Because all I was doing was fueling the fire against the very children that had no chance or control of what they were taught in Public Education much less recognize what they were being taught.

But where did all this begin on such a national scale for our young?  Most likely by a 12 year insertion into their young brains drip by purposeful drip and then ramped way up for those who went to college.

The real culprit as far as I am concerned is quit diabolical and no doubt done by highly educated people with a healthy dose in psychology. They planned this brainwashing program and orchestrated these instructions into the educational curriculum, dumbing down and brainwashing our children. These writings have been all over the chalkboard as evidenced by the removal of Common Core in many states, just as one example. While states also move to school voucher programs so parents can keep their children away from the poisonous atmosphere of Public Education.

Unfortunately, this diabolical scheme of the Left goes far enough back where even parents were brainwashed and their children get it at home even before they enter Kindergarten.

How do we help people flush the poison out of their brains so they can wake from the fog of lies and enable them to reason themselves out of it? What I believe we should do is try our utmost to help those see the light of what has happened to them by showing them the truth and nothing but the truth –“The truth Shall Set You Free”. Sadly, there will be those that you just can’t help and the best option is to just move on and not argue with them much less continue to enable them for the Left by trashing them.

We can only hope that someday those who perpetrated this unholy brainwashing program, the real enemy we face, get paid back tenfold for what they have done to our innocent children.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Democrats/progressives believe that individual Will is mute and must be absorbed with the collective/body and managed by the state.

Load More...