Democrat’s Dangerous Rhetoric Comes Home

There was a terrible shooting in Alexandria Virginia on June 14, 2016 just like many other shootings that occurs when innocent people are injured or killed. However, this time it really came home when congressional Republicans where at an early morning ball practice for an upcoming charity game against their Democrat counterparts from Capitol Hill.

The gunman was a past Bernie Sander’s campaign supporter when he was running for President during the 2016 election cycle.

The gunmen asked 2 individuals that where there at the ballpark if those were Republicans or Democrats that were out on the ball field and they said they are Republicans. They thought it was strange this individual would ask them that but shrugged it off and went back to the Capitol. But once back there they heard the news of what had happened and immediately told police about the incident. Later as it turned out they identified the same man that did the shooting that asked them about the political affiliations of the ball players.

The gunman was sixty six year old James T. Hodgkinson that opened fire on the Republican Congressmen. Majority Whip Steve Scalise was injured along with 4 others. The gunman was engaged by Capitol police and was shot and later died at the hospital. Congressman Scalise was shot in the hip.

Had Majority Whip Scalise not been there with an authorized contingent of Capitol Police, that he was authorized, the death toll would most certainly have been higher, because no one else was armed.

There is another side to this story and one can point a finger directly at the Democrats for the kind of rhetoric they have said over the years, especially the last 8 years. Though Democrats and Republicans alike condemned the obvious planned attack in Capitol chambers, the Democrats do share in the blame for what happened on that ball field. Just because they only ramped up the hate towards Conservatives does not mean that they don’t bear any attachment to a terrible event. Their crime is a moral one, not the type prosecuted in a court of law, but in the court of morality!

Coarse rhetoric has been spilled many times by Democrat political figures including the past President of the United States, Barack Obama, rhetoric which has bordered on violence without actually indicating such. But it has been very easy to surmise that it was exactly the kind of pot that they were surely stirring and violence did occur many times over and they own a piece of it! 

London Bridge Mock Terrorist?

From watching the video of the recent London Bridge Terrorist strike that took place on Saturday June 3, it appears that authorities may have set-up a mock terrorist suspect that was caught with a suicide vest strapped around his body.

Is it possible that the Police are so boxed in on conducting adequate surveillance to track and react to possible terrorist situations that they added to the drama of this terrible attack on Londoners?

The crisis in the United Kingdom on Islamic terrorism has seemed to hit at fever pitch levels of frustration for authorities and that all that can be done is to react after the fact.

 

 

 

 

 

This scene above with apparent terrorist and what appears to be bombs strapped to him, is on the ground and as seen on national television.

Below is the video that shows emergency personnel changing clothes and one of them appears to match the supposed terrorist as seen above. Watch.

UPDATE June 7, 2016

Watching this next video may explain why the Police in London are so frustrated and staged what appears to be a Mock terrorist capture, shown on national television around the world. Mayor Sadiq Khan’s comments after letting 400 Jihadist back in to the city: “we don’t have the resources to track Jihadist”  Maybe the London police set this up in order to obtain more resources they need to protect the people of London. Can anyone blame them?

Muslims Combating Violent Jihad?

A host indicated when combating terrorism at the new anti-terrorism facility [Quote] “because we know these groups can only be defeated if we defeat their ideology,” [end Quote] according to Mohammed al-Issa, secretary-general of the Saudi-based Muslim World League. The host also said 350 technicians will work the main room, which is filled with rows of computers and with dozens of individual workstations.

Saudi Arabia, which is a Muslim nation that practices Islam, built within a 30 day period an anti-terrorism center so that terrorism can be stopped before it is carried out. The looming question is why would they do this considering they are Islamist as well? Before I give an explanation there are a few versus one should read.

Some versus about Islam –

Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 484: – “Allah said, ‘A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.’”

Quran (9:14)“Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people.” Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even “heals” the hearts of Muslims.

Tabari 17:187 “‘By God, our religion (din) from which we have departed is better and more correct than that which these people follow. Their religion does not stop them from shedding blood, terrifying the roads, and seizing properties.’ And they returned to their former religion.” The words of a group of Christians who had converted to Islam, but realized their error after being shocked by the violence and looting committed in the name of Allah. The price of their decision to return to a religion of peace was that the men were beheaded and the woman and children enslaved by the caliph Ali.

Europe has been flooded with Muslim refugees for some time; some countries have shut down borders to keep them out. The natives of the European nations have experienced many terrorist strikes by bombings and any other types of items they could use as a weapon over the years. The governments in the European nations can only react when it’s over for the most part, cleaning up the mess. Women and female children have been raped on the streets and even turned into sex slaves.

A probable answer as to why an Anti-Terrorism center built by Muslims to stop Muslims-

  1. Muslim countries simply do not have the types of weapons to just take over the nations they want; the weapons the Infidels have (non-Muslim) are far superior and can take out all Muslim nations in an instant if they wanted to.
  1. It is in the best interest of other Muslim nations to find and stop a terrorist strike in those infidel dominated nations that are now flooded with Muslim refugees. Why would they do this, because the new Islamic attack plan is to integrate into these nations peacefully, to the point where the Muslims themselves take over through public office, by teaching their ideology and by out birthing the infidels; this is also happening in the U.S. Most Europeans do not have large families but most Muslim families can be quite large in number. A peaceful takeover of non-Muslim nations takes time to accomplish but the end is the same and this method is called Civilization Jihad. However, the Islamist hot heads that flooded into Europe can’t seem to help themselves and wait to dominate peacefully so the fight as their religion dictates they do and is carried out through violent Jihad!

So now it appears why the Saudi’s built an Anti-Terrorism center in the first place. To stop the violent terrorist strikes around the world so that the peaceful war known as “Civilization Jihad” can someday win and non-Islamic nations become Islamic nations.

Civilization Jihad

Update: New information on the Saudi government

 

 

 

 

 

Riyadh attempts to illegally login to my website:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Terrorist Plot Stealth Response

The fact we declared war on terrorism after 9/11 may not have been prosecuted as it should have been. Invading Iraq was most likely a mistake based on evidence that did not materialize later; WMD. Today Iraq is not a solid ally to America and will, possibly, fall prey to radical Islam and a wide range of tribal warfare after we completely pull out. Afghanistan is not a complete success either and a peaceful existence may never materialize as long as radical Islam exists. Terrorist’s cells have reached out to other lands for decades to wreak havoc.

Approximately 1,441 of years of Islam and what it teaches are forever embedded in the culture and will never change; believing otherwise is pure folly.  Conversion to Islam either through peaceful means or by force is the mission for many radical Muslims. This culture of dominance has spread into many counties, such as Israel, Europe, Africa, and the United States.

 

 

 

 

 

Maybe the lessons we should have learned from the outset of our national resolve following 9/11 was to solely use a vast robust network of Special Operations forces? Large military invasions for the most part may be necessary for the short term, such as defeating a large collection of terrorist groups/armies in one place, then pull out. The American people should not be engaged in nation building after a conflict. Most certainly when it comes to an ideology that teaches children from day one to hate a certain race (Jewish) and anyone else that is not a Muslim.

 

 

 

 

 

America has been facing terrorism through Guerrilla Warfare type tactics from radical Islam since before 9/11. Invading armies will not bend or eliminate the Will of the fundamentalist jihadist. However, maybe a much larger Special Operations force could evolve from Southern Command (SOCOM) and become even more robust in number of operators.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Of course the logic seems sound enough to a layman for a special operations force to be as large as an invading army. However, this would require a much more in-depth analysis and study by real terrorist experts, Intelligence personnel and military planners. If something of this magnitude would ever materialize, instead of “The Storm is Coming”, “The Hurricane is Coming”.

Europe Under Siege!

Europe has been overrun by an ideology that means to dominate it and destroy all other cultures that have existed for thousands of years. The people in Europe seem to have been conditioned that this is a good thing for them and for the most part they appear too weak minded to resist the barbaric ways of the Muslim refugees.

These refugees that have been ordered in by the EU is dominating and terrifying millions of Europeans. Only a few countries have not allowed the invading horde to tear down and rip apart their country. But the question remains how long can these nations hold off the invading and dominating culture that is spun in violence and dominance over all other human beings? As one Muslim put it in the video they will (paraphrase) “out birth the inhabitants by marrying their women”, until there are enough numbers to bury all the various cultures in Europe.

Will the United States follow in the footsteps of the EU and continue to bring in more Muslim refugees that cannot or will not blend with America?

Please watch this documentary film of the various countries that are being overrun and attacked by the refugees.

Warning: Graphic testimony of British children raped by Muslims:

British Imam in Britain calls for white women to be sex slaves